Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Hi. I'm Scott Walker and I'm Incompetent. Give Me Money.

In the past week, Scott Walker has shown time and time again that he is not ready to run with the big boys. He has presented a strong case that he can't even answer simple questions that don't match the scripted lines that he worked so hard on memorizing.

Walker has punted a question about evolution. He then fumbled when asked whether he thought President Barack Obama loved the United States. And lest we forget, Walker damn near fainted when he was asked if Obama was a Christian.

So Walker does what comes naturally to him - he tries to monetize it!

Click image to embiggen


Only to Republicans would it make sense to give $1,000 to someone for proving that they are incompetent, spineless and mindless. I guess they didn't have time to film a commercial with Walker looking forlornly into the camera while the narrator says only you can save Koch puppets from the abuse suffered at the hands of the media.

The irony of it all is simply mind boggling.

As bad as this fundraiser email is, it will never top the one he sent out on Black Friday in 2013, in which he told people to forego buying Christmas presents for their children and give him the money instead.

H/T to James Rowen at The Political Environment

20 comments:

  1. Don't forget unintimidated as well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One of the better gifts I could ever give my adult children. Helping elect Gov Walker and Republican majority will save them thousands. Much better they decide how to spend it then spend it on capper blogging on county time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The incompetent leading the incapable.

      Delete
    2. Yes, because nothing says "saving money" like foregoing loan payments only to let the interest compile. It's simply amazing how stupid and easily fooled Walker supporters are. It's as if they only care that he's a religious zealot.

      Delete
    3. One issue voters with blinders on. Sad.

      Delete
    4. Your adult children hate you for being such a self-centered jag that's endangered their future by putting such a dim witted slime ball in power. They'll just never tell you it to your face

      Delete
    5. "Adult children," indeed. In fact, I'm about ready to stop referring to "Team Walker" and start using "Teen Walker," instead.

      Delete
    6. The right side must be an easily manipulated dimwit.

      Delete
  3. Scott Walker is a corrupt narcissistic sociopathic liar that thinks God wants him to run for president. Did I mention delusional too!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Back to the topic at hand. The whole victim game that Walker is playing here is disgusting. You made the choice to pander to the racists that make up a large part of the GOP base (and I do mean base), and now you're complaning that your being held responsible for it?

    Not really leadership material, now is it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Playing the VICTIM CARD when confronted is a oft used tactic of the sociopath.

      Delete
  5. Read the solicitation letter. Walker has figured it out. He is a propaganda machine. His solicitations raise millions to buy 30 second soundbites that drown us with Walker agrandisements. He is selling a false image that buys votes from dupes like The Right Side. Worked for Sarah Palin, works for Scott Walker.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is all you have after years of an Unconstitutional John Doe investigation? I didn't think Walker had a chance, but your buffoonery is proving me wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While I'll stipulate that the wingnuts on the State Supreme Court have in essence been bribed to think otherwise, let me ask: Since when does any legally organized criminal inquiry constitute an assault on any potential defendant's free speech? Would you let a suspected bank robber or murderer go free without an investigation, much less issue charges and hear them in court, just because cops or DAs asked uncomfortable questions and gathered evidence based on a judicial ruling of probable cause?

      Please enlighten us as to how such a duly authorized and regulated criminal investigation could possibly, as the Wisconsin Club for Girth insists, constitute an invasion of privacy or an impingement on free speech -- especially since the first and fourth amendments to the Constitution are not absolute protections, especially not when authorities believe crimes may have been committed. Please explain how an incomplete criminal inquiry can be halted merely based on a complaint from a subject of inquiry that the law is inapplicable, well before there's a chance any criminal court could even consider that claim in context.

      Here's a tip for the possible targets of the Doe: If your howling and your arguments before conservative-friendly civil judges don't succeed and you ever do get charged, simply exercise your Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refuse to testify. Let your fate hang on the actual evidence, rather than try to get judges to destroy that evidence before it can be reviewed. That's obstruction of justice. Meanwhile, shut up and let the case proceed in an orderly fashion, as did the previous Doe and all the many Does before that across many decades.

      Right wingers are so quick to play the victimization card. They can dish it out, but clearly they can't take it. Man up, gang. Stop trying to rig the justice system for your benefit, packing the courts with benchers who have enjoyed your fat campaign assistance and refuse to recuse themselves. Obviously, corruption begets corruption.

      Delete
    2. Your platitudes get you nowhere. That's what's wrong with you Liberals. That's why you're losing.

      Delete
    3. Got nothing,mod ya? No wonder you why you stay Anonymous with weak sauce like that

      Delete
    4. Ive got a country that is Red throughout. That's all I need.

      Delete
    5. Authoritarian Red republican the party of the suburban white supremacist.

      Delete
  7. Walker is upset with "small, petty and pale ideas"? I didn't realize he hated himself so much. I mean, how could the hugely impactful and evolving science of evolution (and, deriving from that, genetics) ever be considered small, petty and pale, even assuming Walker secretly doesn't believe in any of it?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Here's a big, bold and new idea for republicants: I Punt With Walker.

    ReplyDelete