tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post1887686484323601742..comments2023-11-03T03:52:37.873-05:00Comments on Cognitive Dissidence: Walkergate: Justice Bradley Recuses Herself - Will Others Follow?Somebody DO Something!http://www.blogger.com/profile/08717747685928127724noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-68978084981247956192014-03-21T11:34:14.627-05:002014-03-21T11:34:14.627-05:00Lots of unanswered questions about the proceedings...Lots of unanswered questions about the proceedings of John Doe 2.<br />For a good article regarding the ethics of recusal see: http://www.prwatch.org/news/2014/02/12389/new-challenge-john-doe-raises-questions-judicial-ethics<br />The State Court of Appeals in January unanimously shot down their case to stop JD2. The "original action" case--going directly to the Supreme Court--was filed under seal on Feb. 7, although it's essentially the same case as the previous. Original action cases are rarely taken on by Supreme Courts. On Feb. 11, the the Court issued its first order in the case, but sealed its ruling from the public. This is a very unusual move.<br /><br />And, where is the money coming to pay for the likes of David Rivkin in all these lawsuits? The public needs to know.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-34622599821995506652014-03-21T09:28:12.881-05:002014-03-21T09:28:12.881-05:00Note the spin---This was also reposted on RightWis...Note the spin---This was also reposted on RightWisconsin, Charlie's "news" site. http://watchdog.org/133794/recusal-john-doe-case-raises-questions-fairness-purpose/CJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04833070877059285634noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-73018089084571573892014-03-21T09:15:39.566-05:002014-03-21T09:15:39.566-05:00No downside in trying; the deck is already stacked...No downside in trying; the deck is already stacked in favor of the WMC wing of the court. At least, thanks to Bradley, they're now exposed. She doesn't want even the appearance of a conflict to further diminish the court. I'm betting the rest of them will be quite willing to further diminish it.Man MKEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00531054697577604925noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-13846672253918934492014-03-20T11:15:57.837-05:002014-03-20T11:15:57.837-05:00My first thought was, "Oh no!" My next ...My first thought was, "Oh no!" My next one was, "Interesting move, Ann Walsh Bradley." We will see what we will see.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-59427604736773052822014-03-20T07:33:17.501-05:002014-03-20T07:33:17.501-05:00If the WMC judges don't step aside, the recall...If the WMC judges don't step aside, the recall petitions should be filed the next day. And that should be made loud and clear to these folksJake formerly of the LPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15660401299391001751noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-5725488961283752732014-03-20T07:25:20.163-05:002014-03-20T07:25:20.163-05:00Capper, "Crooks" was correct even if tha...Capper, "Crooks" was correct even if that is not her last name.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-51427157895160534962014-03-20T07:14:18.477-05:002014-03-20T07:14:18.477-05:00Thanks!Thanks!capperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08751967312821403092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-71710123217798961492014-03-20T06:37:05.264-05:002014-03-20T06:37:05.264-05:00Patience Roggensack, you mean?Patience Roggensack, you mean?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-36393572514550270952014-03-20T06:16:37.220-05:002014-03-20T06:16:37.220-05:00Annette Ziegler, David Prosser, Michael Gableman a...Annette Ziegler, David Prosser, Michael Gableman and Patrica Crooks have major obligations to the targets of John Doe II because of the financial support given to them for their elections, so there is no way they will recuse themselves. The only morality these judges have is that once they are bought, they stay bought.<br /><br />All of you should stop calling this state "Wississippi" and start calling it "North Illinois."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com