tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post6886929089479496409..comments2023-11-03T03:52:37.873-05:00Comments on Cognitive Dissidence: Gableman Backs DownSomebody DO Something!http://www.blogger.com/profile/08717747685928127724noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-59224163864365737762015-07-01T21:28:14.505-05:002015-07-01T21:28:14.505-05:00When you are bought and paid for and you know you ...When you are bought and paid for and you know you are merely chattel you shut up and do what you are told to do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-65470535311738465192015-07-01T00:53:29.110-05:002015-07-01T00:53:29.110-05:00Gableman's intervention in the matter of Rindf...Gableman's intervention in the matter of Rindfleisch would be a conflict of interest, and demand his recusal, only if it SERVED his interest to intervene in Rindfleisch's case...<br /><br />... but that intervention clearly has only drawn him hostile attention and the potential for prosecution on the basis of corruption; as <b><i>this did NOT serve his interest</i></b>, he withdrew his request.<br /><br />Therefore, the original intervention cannot have been a conflict of interest or required his recusal after all!<br /><br />And by inexorable logic, he'd be clear if he went ahead and made the same request again!<br /><br />(But, being clear, THEN he could serve his own interest...)Ravenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17974090948640572660noreply@blogger.com