Showing posts with label Patriot Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patriot Act. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Walker: Privacy for Me, Not For Thee!

This is a little dated given the recent events regarding the Patriot Act, but it is still relevant as it gives further insight to just how much of a hypocritical weasel Scott Walker really is.

Presidential wannabe Rand Paul was quite adamant as he declared his opposition to extending the Patriot Act.

On the other hand, Scott Walker wanted the Patriot Act to be extended intact
Gov. Scott Walker says he does not support the bill passed by the U.S. House – and written by fellow Wisconsin Republican Jim Sensenbrenner -- that bans the bulk collection of Americans’ call records.

In recent weeks, Walker has waded cautiously into the fierce debate over government surveillance, now coming to a head with some provisions of the Patriot Act set to expire by Monday.

The governor and likely presidential candidate has argued the government needs access to the so-called “meta-data” gathered by the National Security Agency while also calling broadly for a balance between security and privacy concerns.

But Walker's comments Friday night about the USA Freedom Act, which passed the House with more than 300 votes May 13, offer a little more specificity about where he stands on a bill that has divided the GOP’s throng of presidential hopefuls.

Talking to a small group of reporters during a sunset cruise on a New Hampshire lake, Walker was asked if he thinks the bill passed by the House strikes the right balance between security and privacy.

“No,” he said. “I think there needs to be the capacity, if we have in America enemy combatants, or people in line with enemy combatants, we need to be able to gain access to information that would help assist us.”

An aide confirmed that Walker does not support the Sensenbrenner bill, and wants to see the Patriot Act provisions reauthorized.
Keep in mind that the level of scrutiny had already been ruled to be unconstitutional.

But hey, since when did Walker give a damn about following the law?

Remember, it was Walker who, as Milwaukee County Executive, had a secret router installed in his office suite so that he and his staff could circumvent open record requests and to conceal the illegal politicking they were doing:
From this complaint, one of the things that stands out the most is the fact that Tim Russell set up a secondary, secret email system using a wireless router designed to set up a 3G network. They used this set up for their campaigning and fundraising emails, as well as official county business. But because it was secret even to the head of IT, any open records requests would miss this
Much more recently, it was reported that Walker included a nugget in his current state budget proposal that the records from his failed job creation agency be off limits to FOIA requests.

For Walker, the right to privacy - not to mention the right to free speech, the right to vote, the right of people to make their own medical decisions and any other right - are only for the ruling class, not for the little people.

Cross posted at Crooks and Liars

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Somebodys Watching YOU!



By Jeff Simpson

"There is no doubt that if we lived in a police state, it would be easier to catch terrorists. If we lived in a country where the police were allowed to search your home at any time for any reason; if we lived in a country where the government is entitled to open your mail, eavesdrop on your phone conversations, or intercept your e-mail communications; if we lived in a country where people could be held indefinitely based . . . on mere suspicion that they are up to no good, the government would probably discover and arrest more terrorists, or would-be terrorists.... But that wouldn't be a country in which we would want to live."

- Russ Feingold on the USA Patriot Act, Oct 11, 2002
(the only House or Senate member to vote against the USA Patriot Act)

Who do you blame?  Why Both parties of course

 Over 100 people currently serving in the House and Senate voted for the original Act in 2001. Last year, over 300 voted to extend a key provision.

The votes that got us here:


(The "Medicare" bill, above, was gutted and re-written to accommodate three PATRIOT-related measures.) 

Broken down even more: 

The PATRIOT Act

Total current members who voted: 153 Total current members who supported the bill: 118
No sitting Republicans who were in Congress in 2001 voted against the PATRIOT Act. More sitting Democrats supported it than opposed.
Votes by sitting members
Support and opposition by party

PATRIOT Act Reauthorization, 2005

Total current members who voted: 260 Total current members who supported the bill: 151
Currently sitting Democrats were more likely to oppose the extension than to approve it. Several Republican House members opposed the extension, but no Senators did.
Votes by sitting members
Support and opposition by party

FISA Amendments, 2008

Total current members who voted: 304 Total current members who supported the bill: 191
Only one Republican voted against the amendments, which authorized the government to conduct sweeps like the one in the Verizon case.
Votes by sitting members
Support and opposition by party

PATRIOT Act Extension, 2011

Total current members who voted: 430 Total current members who supported the bill: 265
A larger number of sitting Republicans opposed the extension than any of the other three. That includes Senators Murkowski, Paul, Heller, and Lee. Nineteen Democrats who opposed the FISA amendments in 2008 voted in support of it under the new president.
Votes by sitting members
Support and opposition by party

FISA Extension, 2012

Total current members who voted: 437 Total current members who supported the bill: 303
Three Republican senators opposed extending FISA: Lee, Murkowski, and Paul.



 So yes, you can be upset that President Obama has overseen such an overreaching program of the US government in the name of safety, but he is not on an island and he did not break new ground here!