Showing posts with label Verizon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Verizon. Show all posts

Thursday, April 14, 2016

Bernie V Hillary - Which Side Are You On?

By Jeff Simpson 

Last night, as we gear up for next weeks primary in New York, Bernie Sanders held a rally which drew by some estimates up to 50,000 people! 




In 2008, then Senator Obama drew a crowd about half this size and the New York Times called it the tipping point in the election. When Bernie draws that crowd it is barely covered.   I guess we know what the saying "Two Americas" means. 

Now lets look into what Hillary was doing at this time.  At a fund raiser in Communist Beijing, China with Goldman Sach's own Gary Gensler.  I couldnt afford the $3000/plate and plane ticket to get there but I am assuming that Mr. Gensler and Ms. Clinton did not mention the $5 Billion dollar fine that Goldman Sachs was just given for selling faulty mortgage securities to their investors.  At least it allowed the owners of sweat shops to give lots of money to Hillary to help influence American elections. 




But Wait!  There is more.   Probably the biggest difference between the two and why Bernie draws 50,000 people for free and Hillary draws a couple hundred rich folks with big checks.   

Verizon went on strike yesterday.   

Senator Sanders, in a show of solidarity, walked the picket lines with the workers who are just trying to get a fair wage for their hard work.   The 111 Billion dollar company did not get that big without the work of many hard working employees.  



The company is doing well enough that Verizon Communications Inc. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Lowell McAdam received $18.3 million in total compensation last year, a 16 percent increase.

While Bernie was walking the picket line, we found out that Hillary was taking in hundreds of thousands of dollars from Verizon.

The Hillary Clinton campaign, meanwhile, has received tens of thousands of dollars from Verizon executives and lobbyists.
That’s not all. For a May 2013 speech, the corporation paid Clinton a whopping $225,000 honorarium, according to her tax records.
Verizon has also given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation, which investigative journalist Ken Silverstein has referred to as a “so-called charitable enterprise [that] has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends.”
Moreover, the Clinton Foundation has partnered directly with Verizon, which is notorious for its vehement opposition to unions. The corporation is a partner in the Clinton Health Matters Initiative, and said it is “proud to partner with the Clinton Foundation.”

I did not have an extra $225000 to pay to see Hillary's speech, which is why she uses white noise machines so only paying customers can hear her.

I was however able to pay the fee to hear Bernie Sanders give his speech(it was free) to the Verizon workers. Instead of begging for the transcripts, we have actual video.




Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Somebodys Watching YOU!



By Jeff Simpson

"There is no doubt that if we lived in a police state, it would be easier to catch terrorists. If we lived in a country where the police were allowed to search your home at any time for any reason; if we lived in a country where the government is entitled to open your mail, eavesdrop on your phone conversations, or intercept your e-mail communications; if we lived in a country where people could be held indefinitely based . . . on mere suspicion that they are up to no good, the government would probably discover and arrest more terrorists, or would-be terrorists.... But that wouldn't be a country in which we would want to live."

- Russ Feingold on the USA Patriot Act, Oct 11, 2002
(the only House or Senate member to vote against the USA Patriot Act)

Who do you blame?  Why Both parties of course - 

 Over 100 people currently serving in the House and Senate voted for the original Act in 2001. Last year, over 300 voted to extend a key provision.

The votes that got us here:


(The "Medicare" bill, above, was gutted and re-written to accommodate three PATRIOT-related measures.) 

Broken down even more: 

The PATRIOT Act

Total current members who voted: 153 Total current members who supported the bill: 118
No sitting Republicans who were in Congress in 2001 voted against the PATRIOT Act. More sitting Democrats supported it than opposed.
Votes by sitting members
Support and opposition by party

PATRIOT Act Reauthorization, 2005

Total current members who voted: 260 Total current members who supported the bill: 151
Currently sitting Democrats were more likely to oppose the extension than to approve it. Several Republican House members opposed the extension, but no Senators did.
Votes by sitting members
Support and opposition by party

FISA Amendments, 2008

Total current members who voted: 304 Total current members who supported the bill: 191
Only one Republican voted against the amendments, which authorized the government to conduct sweeps like the one in the Verizon case.
Votes by sitting members
Support and opposition by party

PATRIOT Act Extension, 2011

Total current members who voted: 430 Total current members who supported the bill: 265
A larger number of sitting Republicans opposed the extension than any of the other three. That includes Senators Murkowski, Paul, Heller, and Lee. Nineteen Democrats who opposed the FISA amendments in 2008 voted in support of it under the new president.
Votes by sitting members
Support and opposition by party

FISA Extension, 2012

Total current members who voted: 437 Total current members who supported the bill: 303
Three Republican senators opposed extending FISA: Lee, Murkowski, and Paul.



 So yes, you can be upset that President Obama has overseen such an overreaching program of the US government in the name of safety, but he is not on an island and he did not break new ground here!