Showing posts with label Flip Flops. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Flip Flops. Show all posts

Saturday, August 22, 2015

Walker Again Waffles On Immigration

As the gentle reader knows, Scott Walker has changed campaign strategies in an effort to stop the downward spiral he is in. To do so, he decided that he would try to steal voters away from Donald Trump by being a mini-Trump. Everything Trump says, Walker agrees with. The only difference is while Trump as the Hell Toupee, Walker needs a toupee.

One of the things Walker echoed Trump on was the idea to do away with the constitutional amendment allowing birthright citizenship. Walker said that we needed to stop following this amendment in order to follow the law.



Yeah, it doesn't make any more sense to me either.

Anyway, true to his real nature, Walker has again started to waffle on his position, saying he didn't really mean what he said and blamed this gaffe on being tired:
But Walker sidestepped when asked where he stood now. “In both of these instances, what I’ve said and I pointed it out, I did a three-and-a-half hour gaggle, so there was bits and pieces of people interrupting, while we were taking questions along the way,” the GOP presidential candidate said.

In general, when it comes to a policy position on immigration, Walker just hasn’t figured out where he lands. As county executive in Milwaukee County between 2002 and 2006, he twice signed resolutions backing programs that would have granted legal status to undocumented immigrants. He told the Wausau Daily Herald editorial board in 2013 that “it makes sense” for some immigrants to get on a pathway to citizenship “with the right penalties and waiting periods and meet the requirements.” Some donors say that he privately told them that he supported a pathway to citizenship, though his spokesperson has consistently denied that.
Now, given the fact that the only consistency with Walker's immigration stance is his inconsistency, and seeing how he is going to need a lot of money to stay in the race - not to mention his own personal financial problems - Walker might want to see if he can pick up a sponsor to help him as he goes traveling the country:

Image courtesy of Blue Gal Fran at
Crooks and Liars

Sunday, July 12, 2015

Is Walker's Campaign Over Before It Starts?

Michael Brendan Dougherty, writing at The Week, discusses Scott Walker's campaign and his chances at winning the GOP nomination. Dougherty notes that Walker was in the driver's seat and looked like he had a real chance but with the clown car turning into a clown microbus and Walker's own inconsistencies and hypocrisies are leaving Walker "diminished."

Dougherty then gives a fairly good, although in no way exhaustive, laundry list of Walker's foibles, flip flops and fails:
First there was his performance at CPAC, which revealed that Walker is almost entirely untutored in foreign affairs. Remember when he said that if he could take on 100,000 protestors in Wisconsin, he could take on ISIS? In which direction is that comparison more idiotic? He's been reading a few books on the subject, though. So there's that.

Walker also slipped into near self-parody when he hailed Reagan's conflict with the air-traffic controllers union as a major foreign policy victory. What's next, fixing entitlements by defeating the electrician's union?

Donors noticed these slip-ups. But Walker also hurt his reputation with less wealthy supporters. Despite portraying himself as a fearless man of the political battle, he engaged in some embarrassing pandering by firing an adviser merely because she had expressed some coherent views on Iowa's pathetic reliance on ethanol subsidies. The supposed fighter caved before the corn lobby, since he sees Iowa as his best shot at establishing himself in the race. The former opponent of ethanol is now a friend of the stuff.

Muddying his positions has been Walker's modus operandi since the beginning of the 2016 campaign. He's made a mess of his stance on immigration. He told Fox News he opposes amnesty, then went to New Hampshire and said he supports granting citizenship to 11 million undocumented immigrants. He reconciled these positions by saying he wanted to secure the border first, then naturalize those 11 million. And back in 2006 he was for a comprehensive immigration reform bill that had a path to citizenship. So really, who knows?

He's created a similar mess on education. Gearing up to be the conservatives' conservative, Walker is now opposed to Common Core standards, which are often labeled "ObamaCore" by the policy's most active conservative opponents. But as governor, Walker mostly let Core standards come into place, and offered only the most token opposition to them. His approach to this issue is much worse than that of Jeb Bush, who frames his unapologetic and occasionally unpopular support for Common Core in conservative terms of accountability. In the past week, a diverse ideological coalition demanded that Walker stop giving "excuses and half truths" about this issue.
As a Wisconsinite, I can tell you that this is like a breath of fresh air. Not that I am taking any pride in an incompetent, corrupt hypocrite as our governor.

But when you look at the major corporate news sites in Wisconsin, they are gushing all over Walker and his campaign. And even when they force themselves to admit that Walker might have some problems, they bury it at the bottom of the article, knowing that most readers will have moved on to another story before they get that far.

Monday, June 22, 2015

Walker Whiffles Dixie

Over this past weekend, when asked about the senseless killing in Charleston, South Carolina, Scott Walker boldly punted on questions regarding the Confederate flag:
"I think they're going to have a good healthy debate and should have that debate in South Carolina amongst officials at the state level," Walker told reporters after his dinner speech at the "Road to Majority" conference.

"I just think before I or anyone else weighs in on anything to do with policy, whether it's this or any other policy decisions, we should honor the dead and the families by allowing them to bury their loved ones. And then you could perfectly ask me that question at some point in the next week or two when that's done."

Walker also deferred when asked by a reporter if he viewed the Confederate flag as a symbol of racism.
Walker has since changed his mind about honoring the victims and their families and has come out in support of Governor Nikki Haley's call to finally take down the Confederate flag:
After sidestepping questions about the issue over the weekend, Gov. Scott Walker on Monday said he supports South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley's call to remove the Confederate flag from the state Capitol.

"I am glad @nikkihaley is calling for the Confederate flag to come down. I support her decision - SKW," Walker tweeted from his political account shortly after Haley called for the flag to be taken down.

The push to remove the flag comes in the wake of the racially-motivated killing of nine black worshippers in a historic Charleston church last week.
Apparently Walker also got the memo from the dark money special interest groups that this was a loser issue and not worth the battle.

On a related note, just like so many other Republicans - including Wisconsin's dumb senator, Ron Johnson - Walker received campaign donations from Earl Holt III, the leader of a white supremacist group that reportedly influenced Dylann Roof. Walker has said that he would donate the $3,500 he got from Holt to charity:
AshLee Strong, a spokeswoman for Walker’s political nonprofit, Our American Revival, said in a statement Monday that Walker will donate Holt’s contributions to charity.
Putting aside what the spokeswoman for his nonprofit is doing speaking for his campaign, I would point out to the gentle reader that this is more of Walker's mastery of subliminal racism.

If Walker was genuinely repulsed by the blatant racism of Holt and his organization, Walker would have renounced the money and returned it or burned it. By giving the money to charity, Walker is allowing Holt to retain his dignity, saying that his money went to a good cause. Likewise, it gives Walker the chance to appear that he doesn't support racism without coming out against it.

Friday, March 27, 2015

Does Walker Even Know Where He Stands On Immigration Anymore?



At the beginning of March, Scott Walker boldly flip-flopped on his stance towards immigration:
Walker: "I believe there's a way that you can do that. First and foremost, you've got to secure that border or none of these plans make any sense."

Wallace: "But it's a little bit slippery here. Back when you were the Milwaukee County Executive, you actually supported the Kennedy-McCain comprehensive immigration plan. Are you basically saying that as part of a comprehensive plan — tough enforcement, E-Verify — the 11 million people already here pay penalty, they get citizenship?"

Walker: No, I'm not talking about amnesty. And the reason for that is, over time —

Wallace: "But you said you supported it."

Walker: "And my view has changed. I'm flat-out saying it. Candidates can say that. Sometimes they don't. I'm saying my view has —

Wallace: "So you've changed from 2013?"

Walker: "Absolutely. I look at the problems we've experienced for the last few years. I've talked to governors on the border and others out there. I've talked to people all across America. And the concern I have is that we need to secure the border. We ultimately need to put in place a legal immigration system that works, and part of doing that is putting the onus on employers. Give them E-Verify and the tools to do that, but I don't think you do it through amnesty."
It now appears that he has done yet another flip-flop on the issue:
Just one day before Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is set to tour the Texas-Mexico border with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, the Wall Street Journal's Reid Epstein reports the governor indicated yet another shift in his immigration stance.

[...]

According to Epstein's report, Walker told New Hampshire Republicans at a private dinner that he would support allowing undocumented immigrants to remain in the United States and eventually become eligible for citizenship.

The article cites "three people present" at the dinner as confirmation of the governor's remarks.
Walker's inconsistency and complete turnarounds - depending on who he is talking to and what day of the week it is - is quickly becoming a sore spot with many conservatives who are questioning if they can trust Walker on any issue.

Walker's campaign spokeswoman, of course, denies the account and says that he has switched his position any more times than he has already switched it.

By now, I don't know that anyone can tell if it is true or not. Hell, I'm not even sure that Walker even knows where he stands on the issue anymore.

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Walker Does A Complete Flip Flop On Immigration



Sunday Morning, Scott Walker appeared with Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday" and completely reversed himself on immigration:
His response now is that President Barack Obama's executive actions on immigration forged Walker's new belief.

"I don't believe in amnesty, and part of the reason why I've made that a firm position is I look at the way that this president has handled that issue," Obama told Wallace. "I was one of the first governors that joined the lawsuit that has been successful at least on this initial technicality, and I hope we prevail ultimately throughout the courts.

"And then going forward, I think the way you enforce it is not through amnesty. I think the better approach is to enforce the laws and to give employers, job creators, the tools like E-Verify and other things, to make sure the law is being upheld going forward."

That led to this exchange between Wallace and Walker:

Wallace: "The question was, can you envision a world where if these people paid a penalty, that they would have a path to citizenship, and you said, sure that makes sense."

Walker: "I believe there's a way that you can do that. First and foremost, you've got to secure that border or none of these plans make any sense."

Wallace: "But it's a little bit slippery here. Back when you were the Milwaukee County Executive, you actually supported the Kennedy-McCain comprehensive immigration plan. Are you basically saying that as part of a comprehensive plan — tough enforcement, E-Verify — the 11 million people already here pay penalty, they get citizenship?"

Walker: No, I'm not talking about amnesty. And the reason for that is, over time —

Wallace: "But you said you supported it."


Walker: "And my view has changed. I'm flat-out saying it. Candidates can say that. Sometimes they don't. I'm saying my view has —

Wallace: "So you've changed from 2013?"

Walker: "Absolutely. I look at the problems we've experienced for the last few years. I've talked to governors on the border and others out there. I've talked to people all across America. And the concern I have is that we need to secure the border. We ultimately need to put in place a legal immigration system that works, and part of doing that is putting the onus on employers. Give them E-Verify and the tools to do that, but I don't think you do it through amnesty."
Hmm... Walker decided he was against amnesty after Barack Obama, the first black president, did an executive order to allow it? Gee, do you think that Walker might just be blowing his dog whistle to appease his radical fringe base and pandering to his racist, big money donors? Just maybe?

Media Matters actually caught the change in Walker's position a month ago when he said the same thing on ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos

Then again, Walker flip flopping on issues is nothing new. He's built his career on telling people what he wants them to hear for decades. Another recent example of this is his double reversal on so called Right to Work legislation which he was for before he was against before he was for it again.

In Wisconsin, we joke that if you don't like the weather, stick around ten minutes and it will change. The same can be said for Walker's position on any given issue.

Friday, June 6, 2014

Scotty's Flip Flop

By Jeff Simpson


 You can tell when election season starts, it is when politicians start flip flopping like a fish out of water.    Scott Walker, Mr. Unintimidated, was against Ethanol before he was for it!


 


Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Could Chris Abele Buy Another Election?

In 2011, when Scott Walker had the governor's seat bought for him, it opened up a special election in Milwaukee County to replace him as county executive..  There were three primary opponents.  On the left were Chris Abele and Jim Sullivan.  Coming in from right field was Jeff Stone, Walker Clone.

Even after spending truckloads of his own cash, Abele barely eked past Sullivan in the primary.  In the
general election, Abele was able to ably defeat Stone by promising not to be another Walker.  If only we knew then what we know now.

I bring this bit of history up because of an article by Jack Carver, writing for the Cap Times, who pondered if Abele would have had a shot at being the Democratic gubernatorial candidate.  What he found was not promising for the Milwaukee County Emperor:
But to many Democrats, toning down the criticism of Abele would be tantamount to betraying
the party. The contempt many activists hold for Abele oozed in responses to a question I asked about Abele's political future on Facebook.

“Chris Abele might be the biggest phony in the history of Democratic politics,” responded Joe Wineke, former chairman of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, who is similarly unimpressed with the County Board’s behavior.

Brennan Balestrieri, a Milwaukee progressive activist who managed Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chris Larson’s first campaign for office in 2010, not only called Abele’s Democratic credentials a joke, but said Abele is doing everything in his power to prevent other Democrats from making an impact on the state.

“Democrats use the Milwaukee County Board as a farm league to get passionate public servants like Sen. Nikiya Harris and Sen. Chris Larson experience and poised for higher office,” he explained. “Abele answered the prayer of ALEC, Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce and the GOP by removing one of the few, scant pulpits progressives enjoy.” 
By supporting the GOP on the County Board downsizing bill, Abele likely knew he was kissing certain political alliances goodbye. That’s presumably why the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign campaign finance database shows that after giving gobs of money to Democratic candidates over the past decade, Abele finally wrote his first checks to two GOP candidates last year — $500 to state Reps. Joe Sanfelippo of West Allis and Dale Kooyenga of Brookfield.
Carver also cited Louis Weisberg of the Wisconsin Gazette, who wrote an article gushing in favor of Abele, mostly because he had given tens of thousands of dollars to LGBT causes.

There is no denying that Abele has given a lot of money to the LGBT cause and has promoted marriage equality.  Abele's most progressive feat was to open the door for domestic partners of Milwaukee County employees to get health care benefits.

But even his stalwart support for the LGBT community doesn't come without some caveats.  As noted in Carver's article, Abele gave money to Sanfelippo and Kooyenga, two of the most rabid anti-gay politicians in the state legislature. We also must not forget that Abele was one of the cosponsors for a fundraiser for his wholly-owned supervisor, Deanna "Purple Unicorn" Alexander.  Alexander is strongly homophobic and even drove to Racine to show off her bigotry.

Abele supporters have argued that the little bit of money given to the anti-gay law makers is nothing compared to what he has done for the cause, which is true to a point. But one must keep in mind that the money he gave the pro-equality groups is the equivalent of one of us giving away five or ten dollars.  Secondly, these were legislators, who pass the hate-filled laws of the land, that he was giving money too, thereby defeating the purpose of giving money to the LGBT groups.

And it's not just the LGBT community that Abele has betrayed in just the past two years.

He had promised his friendship to the veterans in Milwaukee County.  But he then disregarded their requests when it came to the War Memorial Center.  He also cut off many of the supports, like mental health and substance abuse counseling, on which may vets are reliant.

Abele alienated the African American and Hispanic groups when he took away their voice by gutting the County Board and all but eliminating representative government.

Abele has also angered many women with his misogynistic attack - one in a series of many - against Chairwoman Marina Dimitrijevic on Pay Equality Day of all days.

Heck, Abele has even stiffed the art crowd, yanking funding from under them without warning or thought.

Workers of both the public and private sectors have tasted bitter betrayal from Abele as well.

In March of 2011, the Labor Press quoted Abele as saying:
"The crisper Chris Abele, who seems to have gained a directness of words from the rigors of campaigning, was on view at the South Shore Forum on Economic Development March 16, when he was asked from the audience to name several ways he differed from Scott Walker.

“First, I believe in collective bargaining for all workers,” Abele said forcefully – and the South Side crowd jumped with thunderous applause, to the chagrin of the waiting Jeff Stone, also at the forum.

Abele explained how he knew “from personal experience as a manager” the truth that cooperation in bargaining was better. He recalled when he was on the Milwaukee Symphony board years ago during a major economic crisis. The organization got through and emerged stronger because many savings along with good ideas came from the musicians – and Abele and the board made sure they were given credit for the solutions. This was across the bargaining table because the musicians are a hard-nosed American Federation of Musicians local.
Eighteen months later after, Abele won reelection, he was singing the praise of Act 10, which ended the collective bargaining he praised while first running for the seat. It should also be noted that one of the reasons Abele and the GMC gave for their power grab is that they felt county workers weren't being punished enough. This is in spite of the fact that county workers have had pay cuts more than twice that state workers were getting.  There are Milwaukee County employees who are already eligible for public assistance, along with their publicly funded paychecks.  How's that for efficiency?

Likewise, Abele has come out against the workers at Palermo's, saying that they should be thankful for their minimum wage jobs, which come complete with major job safety violations.  More recently, he's also come out against low wage workers like hotel maids and in favor of the people that would exploit them to enhance their own riches.

After alienating all these groups, Abele would be hard pressed to win a position of dog catcher in the next election, despite all of his wealth.  In fact, it is his wealth that is the only thing allowing him to stay in office this far.  Between pandering to some groups with is checkbook while attempting to punish others by putting financial pressures on those who would oppose him, Abele has done his own version of "divide and conquer."

There is a saying that when fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a Bible.

Apparently we can now say that when plutocracy comes to Milwaukee County, it will be wrapped in a rainbow flag and brandishing a platinum card.

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Mitt's Flip Flops

Here is twenty minutes of Mitt Romney, showing how he has no backbone, morals or beliefs!

Nuff Said!   

Thursday, November 25, 2010

When Words Fail

Earlier in the week, one of Scott Walker's transition team advisers got the dirty job of floating a test balloon, one proposing a higher sales tax in order to lower property taxes. When there was a strong reaction against such an idea, Walker got to do his usual grandstanding and say he was against taxes.

Because the reaction was so strong, he had his top level apologists, Charlie Sykes and Patrick McIlheran, do their best to spin the story into something it's not.

Basically, these two propagandists tried to shovel the false pretense of how refreshing it was for a politician like Walker to unequivocally say "no" to something, like raising taxes.

But the question is this: Does Walker really mean no?

As Milwaukee County Executive, Walker has said no lots of times, but turns around and does the opposite. The most obvious example of this is regards to the stimulus funds. When these funds were on their way to becoming a reality, Walker said he would not take them. In fact, he went on the national stage to do so. But when the day was done, not only did he grab that stimulus cash with both hands, he even bragged about it, whether it be for the airport or for his "Milwaukee Works" gimmick. (Whatever happened to "Milwaukee Works" anyway? Seems to me it should have been called "Milwaukee Gets Laid Off.")

He said he was going to say no to those big bad unions. But after he was forced out of his first attempt to be governor, Walker not only said "yes" to the unions, but gave them a signing bonus as well.

The list goes on and on and on with every flip flop Walker makes.

For Sykes and McIlheran to try to claim that Walker is a man of his word now is just plain desperation on their part. It also shows that they are as untrustworthy as their friend Walker, but we knew that already.

Cross-posted at Whallah!.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Walker's Found A New Gaffe

Apparently painting himself into a corner by having to decide if he was going to break his promise to create jobs or to break his promise of stopping high speed rail, wasn't good enough for Goobernator-elect Scott Walker and his transition team.

Now Walker et alia have decided to go for a record time for the most flip flops.

Walker, as Milwaukee County Executive, actively opposed even allowing a referendum on whether the county should be allowed to raise the sales tax as a source for dedicated funding for the parks and the transit systems. In return, people would have had their property tax reduced. After he lost the fight and the referendum was approved by the citizens, he called the voters stupid.

This morning, one of Walker's top guys of his transition team, floated out the trial balloon of the state increasing their sales tax by 2 or even 2.5%:

A key member of Gov.-elect Scott Walker's transition team is floating an increase in Wisconsin's sales tax as a way to stimulate the economy and create jobs.

Former state budget director Rick Chandler says hiking the sales tax from 5 percent to 7 or 7.5 percent would allow the state to reduce income and property taxes, which rank among the highest in the nation.

My, doesn't that sound familiar?

Well, as you can imagine, it this trial balloon fell like a hunk of lead as people became alarmed that Walker wasn't really who he portrayed himself to be, the worker of miracles with pixie dust and a glib tongue.

Things got so bad that his transition team, instead of creating jobs, had to once again go into damage control mode, claiming that his aide was speaking independently and going for plausible deniability. He even had to call upon his top apologists to help spin away the brunt of the people's anger.

Even with that, people started questioning their decision to support him.

Now, I don't think that they thought this would really fly. But they did lay the ground work for two possible courses of action. His Republican allies could decide to allow a smaller sales tax to pass and blame it on the Democrats or they Walker could decide to go with the use of fees and other similar non-tax taxes.

Either way, I am sure he will find a way to get his tax cuts to his wealthy friends and sticking it to the working class.

Again, I have to ask: Is it too soon to start saying "I told you so"?

Monday, October 25, 2010

Scott Walker, Tax Arranger

Scott Walker claims to be against taxes.


He's not really against taxes. It was just no one had found his selling price before.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Walker Flip Flops On O'Donnell Park. Again.

Scott Walker was for selling it before he was for saving it before he didn't care before he wanted to sell it again.

Details at Milwaukee County First.

Sunday, August 8, 2010

He Will Say Anything

I know this has been out for a few days, but it is a big hit up north:



And, of course, lest we forget, there is "Big Talker Walker:"



Heh.

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Brett Favre, MVP vs Scott Walker, MVP


It was reported this morning that Brett Favre is again saying that he is going to hang up his cleats and retire for good this time. For obvious reasons, there are many skeptics, especially here in Packerland. This will be Favre's third or fourth time filling out the retirement papers, so many people, justifiably, think that he might be just pulling a stunt to avoid training camp again this year.

I won't go into speculating whether this is the real thing this time or not. But if it is, I would like to think that most people will be able to get past their bitterness and remember Favre for the sixteen wonderful years he gave Packer fans.

I know that I will always remember the two Superbowls, all the play off games, the records that Favre broke time and time again, and the fact that he was named Most Valuable Player three times.

In response to the Favre news, Scott Walker reminds us that he is also a MVP in this most ironic of tweets:


It does not take a lot of hard research to find a myriad of instances of Walker changing his mind about something in relatively short order, since I have written about his flip flopping on many occasions. But to refresh the reader's memory, let me offer these as just a few examples:
  • Most recently, his flip flop on smoking. Despite the fact that years ago, he ordered no smoking in or around county buildings, and the fact that just days ago, he said that it was too soon to look at repealing the recently enacted smoking ban, he is now for repealing it, after his primary opponent, Mark Neumann, stated that he would repeal it, if he could.
  • Regarding the Second Amendment, Walker now claims to be for concealed carry, even though as a state legislator, he continuously voted against it.
  • Walker "had concerns" about Arizona's immigration law, that is until he received a lot of flak about it from other conservatives. Then, within twenty-four hours, during what was supposedly a non-campaign related bike ride, he decided he liked the Arizona law.
  • Candidate Walker said that he thought late night sessions in the state legislature was a bad idea, even though state legislator Walker actually voted to approve the late night sessions.
  • Then there is most famous flip flopping track record, where he has taken, at the time of this writing, approximately 681,243.7 different positions on the use of stimulus dollars, depending on what day of the week it was, if there was and "R" in the month, and who he happened to be talking to at that particular moment.
Of course, in Walker's case the V in his MVP does not stand for Valuable. It stands for Vacillating.

Monday, July 12, 2010

The Human Weather Vane

I have often railed against the hypocrisy and the flip flops that Scott Walker routinely exhibits. The man issues positions on subjects depending on which way the wind happens to be blowing at that particular moment. Then he doesn't even blink an eye when he reverses himself, sometimes even within only days or hours. A short laundry list of the more wel-known flip flops/acts of hypocrisy would include:
  • Most recently, his flip flop on smoking. Despite the fact that years ago, he ordered no smoking in or around county buildings, and the fact that just days ago, he said that it was too soon to look at repealing the recently enacted smoking ban, he is now for repealing it, after his primary opponent, Mark Neumann, stated that he would repeal it, if he could.
  • Regarding the Second Amendment, Walker now claims to be for concealed carry, even though as a state legislator, he continuously voted against it.
  • Walker "had concerns" about Arizona's immigration law, that is until he received a lot of flak about it from other conservatives. Then, within twenty-four hours, during what was supposedly a non-campaign related bike ride, he decided he liked the Arizona law.
  • Candidate Walker said that he thought late night sessions in the state legislature was a bad idea, even though state legislator Walker actually voted to approve the late night sessions.
  • Then there is most famous flip flopping track record, where he has taken, at the time of this writing, approximately 681,243.7 different positions on the use of stimulus dollars, depending on what day of the week it was, if there was and "R" in the month, and who he happened to be talking to at that particular moment.
I don't always agree with any candidate, even the ones that I like. But how can Walker's supporters argue in his favor, when no one can be sure exactly where he is coming from or what his stance will be on any given day on any given topic.

Maybe it his flexibility on issues that they really appreciate, since it gives them the perception that they have more input on things:

As for me, I'd prefer some consistency. Even if I don't agree with what they are saying, I respect a person if they keep it real.

Monday, May 17, 2010

Walker Gains More National Attention

This time it is from TPM:

Scott Walker, a Republican candidate for governor in Wisconsin, may have set the record for fastest flip-flop on the Arizona immigration law yet.

In a story first published Friday, Walker told the AP, "In America, we don't want our citizens getting pulled over because of how they look."

Throughout the day Friday, Walker's campaign Facebook page was deluged with comments, many from people threatening not to vote for him.

Well, of course, Walker flip flopped on the issue the very next day (more on that later).

But fastest flip flop record breaker...I think that would be a great slogan for Walker, don't you?