Lance Burri* posts that the nutters in La Crosse County are going to again show that they are tougher than chipmunks by holding an open carry picnic in a low-crime, rural area.
Hopefully, if they can keep this going successfully, it might help diminish the stigma attached to mental illnesses.
That weekend, I will be cutting grass, moving brush, cooking out and other assorted activities, all without a gun on my person, showing that I am even tougher and smarter than that whole group combined.
*Burri gets demerit points for the unintentional pun: "Free drawings for prizes"
Saturday, May 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
Capper,
ReplyDeleteWhat is your problem with the 2nd amendment?
What part of sanity do you have a problem with?
ReplyDeleteBeing insane is not unconstitutional.
ReplyDeleteBut being sane sure increases the quality of one's life, plus the lives of those around you.
ReplyDeleteBut it's OK. We already understand the insecurity of right wingers and their need to cover it up through intimidation, bullying and false machismo. Guns make that so much easier.
Shouldn't be these be known as male enhancement devices?
ReplyDeleteYou realize that in states like Texas and Arizona, people actually walk into grocery stores with guns strapped to their hip?
ReplyDeleteAaron,
ReplyDeleteArizona also has a law that violates the Fourth Amendment and is nothing more than legalized bigotry. Obviously, their laws are ones NOT to imitate.
Capper has proven once again he is against some people having their rights, while being wrong again on his interpretation of a law he obviously does not understand.
ReplyDeleteWow, some people just don't read previous comments. Or maybe they do, but don't care, which would explain why they choose to remain anonymous.
ReplyDeleteHow does being anonymous on these blogs change the facts? You wrote the Az law was bigotry and hatred and you wrote it was racial profiling at its worst. The law is written to enforce existing federal law that has been on the books for more than 60 years; you might have known this if you read it.
ReplyDeleteSo you are against those who are willing within their rights to openly carry a firearm, but are for those that break federal law by entering this country illegally yet worried enforcing current law to detect them is racist...nice conundrum.
The Second Amendment says that we have a right to own a gun. I like that, having two shotguns and a long rifle myself. It does not say that there is a right to go around playing Gene Autry at a picnic, looking like a fool.
ReplyDeleteThe Fourth Amendment is about illegal search and seizure, such as stopping someone based on their skin color.
Of course, why worry about the Constitution when it's not convenient for you, right? Sad that the right wingers only use the Constitution like the Bible, out of convenience.
Not sure what your fascination with Autry is, but under current law and the 2nd amendment these people are within their rights...wonder why you have a problem with people exercising their rights, speaking of fools?
ReplyDeleteI have a challenge for you, if you dare. Show what portion of the new Az law allows for stopping someone based on their skin color...should be easy for you if you are correct.
I'll give you some help...nothing in the Az law allows for your false "claim", again you would know that if you actually read it. The law specifically forbids it, but then again you wouldn't know that without reading it. Your consistent delving into fantasy instead of dealing in reality speaks volumes...please continue.
When challenged there is silence...lol.
ReplyDeleteI wasn't aware that you said anything worth responding too.
ReplyDeleteLike I thought, when challenged to support your erroneous and false claim you don't want to respond...
ReplyDeleteI was waiting for you to give some proof supporting your point of view. I guess I'll be waiting for a while.
ReplyDeleteMy proof is in the law as written. If you want links please let me know.
ReplyDeleteNow that you have my proof...will you provide any support or continue to side step the issue of supporting your claims of statements like this one; "stopping someone based on their skin color".
Hmmm, what do you call that dance step?
ReplyDeleteJust as I thought another typical liberal, make wild accusations and then fall silent on support.
ReplyDeleteContinue your dance of shame.