Monday, May 7, 2012

Armchair Quarterbacking the Recall Election

An essay written by Lisa Subeck, republished here with her permission:
In the recall election to remove Scott Walker, it seems everyone is an armchair quarterback. This is the age of social media, blogs, and news via the internet, so we get a closer look at what the average voter – not just the political commentator – is thinking. In most elections, individuals use these tools to debate the issues and show support for the candidate most closely aligned with their own views. This election is different. As we prepare to go to the polls to choose the Democratic nominee for Governor, voters are focused as much on electability as substance.

There has been no doubt from the beginning that either Kathleen Falk or Tom Barrett will win the primary, and recent polls show Barrett with a significant lead. Is Barrett’s lead thanks to his positions on the issues? Does his lead come from promises made on the campaign trail? Does Barrett have significantly stronger Executive experience? No, no, and no. Barrett’s lead appears a product of perceived electability.

Needless to say, Democrats are desperate to remove Scott Walker from office. Nearly one million of us signed recall petitions to do just that. It is only natural that we want to run the candidate who is most likely to beat Walker in the general election. The question remains, how do we know which candidate is best suited to do so? Enter, armchair quarterbacks.

Some argue Barrett is more likely to beat Walker because Wisconsinites will not elect a woman Governor. Never mind that Kathleen Falk has been breaking glass ceilings her entire life, including being the first woman ever elected Dane County Executive. Ignore the gender gap among voters created by a slew of “War on Women” legislation. Forget that Tammy Baldwin was all but written off by the establishment Democrats when she won her first Congressional race. The good old boys claim we are not ready for a woman Governor, but Kathleen Falk is prepared to prove them wrong. Now is the time to break the glass ceiling in the Governor’s office.

Others claim Falk cannot win because of her labor endorsements. Have they forgotten how the recall began? Do they not remember the hundreds of thousands of people from all walks of life who came out to protest when Walker slashed collective bargaining rights for public employees? This election cannot be won without the support of labor. When Act 10 was proposed and later passed, Falk protested alongside the working families of Wisconsin, earning their respect. When the recall began, Falk hit the road and collected signatures with us. Wisconsin voters are looking for a Governor who respects public employees and will restore our rights, and Kathleen Falk is the only candidate who has presented a plan to do so.

Falk’s electability has been questioned because she is a “Dane County Liberal.” The conventional wisdom says that makes her less appealing in other parts of the state. Well, conventional wisdom isn’t always so wise. In other statewide elections, Falk has done better than Barrett and garnered more votes than he did in counties statewide. Barrett only won 13 counties in his last statewide race, while Falk led in more than 30 counties when she ran for Attorney General. Plenty of Dane County liberals have been elected to statewide office including Russ Feingold and Jim Doyle. Meanwhile, the last Democrat with strong Milwaukee ties to be elected Governor appears to be George W. Peck in 1891, more than a century ago.

Finally, many claim we need a candidate who will appeal to moderates and independents traditionally viewed as swing voters. However, this election is anything but traditional. Beating Scott Walker requires getting every single petition signer – along with their friends, relatives, and neighbors who did not get around to signing – out to vote on June 5. Kathleen Falk has the kind of appeal needed to motivate the base and win the recall. She is a tireless campaigner who got in the race early. Though no candidate in this race is likely to out-fundraise Scott Walker, Falk has a reputation as one of the best fundraisers among Democratic candidates. Both Barrett and Falk have broad appeal among the Democratic voters who will be crucial to beating Scott Walker. Some like Barrett for this or Falk for that. Others hate Falk for this or Barrett for that. In the end, though, it is the ability to turn out our own base – not appeal to independents – that will determine the Democratic nominee’s ability to win against Walker.

So, here’s a little armchair quarterbacking of my own. The key to beating Scott Walker is having a plan that goes beyond June 5. Kathleen Falk is the only candidate with a plan to not only stop the bleeding caused by Scott Walker but to repair the damage Walker has done to workers’ rights, women’s rights, economic security, our environment, and more. If she wins Tuesday’s primary, Kathleen Falk can win against Scott Walker on June 5th and put Wisconsin back on track.

Remember, a candidate is only unelectable as long as we refuse to elect her.

11 comments:

  1. Again, the ridiculousl argument based on the ridiculously poor research on how many governors have come from Milwaukee in the past century or so. Who is behind this bad research, for what weird and apparently divisive purpose, and continuing to distribute it despite being given the facts before? Do they realize that they must be looking only at places of birth on Wikipedia -- as do sixth-graders -- rather than looking even a little farther for where governors lived when elected? That doesn't even take looking at the many history books on our state, easily available (many online) when our state historical society has a great website (with even more online) for the facts in only a few minutes more.

    As soon as I saw that myth perpetrated in this piece, I stopped reading, as that casts doubt on the credibility of the rest of its "research" for "facts."

    And that I now have seen this myth perpetrated here again casts doubt on the credibility of all else on this blog, which is sad after seeing what seemed to be much solid research here. But a good blog maintains its rep with double-checking before just cutting and pasting from others to be sure that they are as careful as this blog at least used to be.

    I'll have to hope that another site will rise to provide us with solid research for the rest of the campaign -- and for the rest of the investigation into Walker.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No. We believe in free speech here. We also support the people here.

      Is that a problem?

      Delete
    2. Free speech, like all freedoms, requires responsible use of your right to it.

      Irresponsibility is a problem, yes.

      Inaccuracy is irresponsible. I would have thought that you knew that, from what appeared to be your responsible research in past about current events. I had no idea that you were irresponsible about researching the past -- and that sadly is cause to reconsider your research of any sort. It may have been more irresponsible than I had realized, knowing now that you do not understand that freedoms require responsibilities.

      Delete
    3. I did my research, Milwaukeean, and the last Democratic governor to be elected with strong Milwaukee ties was, indeed, Peck. If you believe I'm wrong, please share who you think I missed. I suspect you may be thinking of Schreiber, but Schreiber was never elected Governor. He moved into the position when Lucey resigned then lost reelection to the post a year later.

      Delete
    4. Hmmm, Francis McGovern? Or maybe being the DA is not "strong Milwaukee ties" to you. Hmmm, Emmanuel Phillip, who lived two doors down from my house in the city? Or maybe being a Schlitz executive is not "strong Milwaukee ties" to you, either. So before I go on, you need to define your terms.

      (And speaking of terms, they finished their terms. But that's another discussion that you don't want to have, I bet, as you continue to try to deflect. Do you really think that Walker would allow you to do so in the general? Really? Primaries are for vetting our candidates, and we keep getting deflection from some campaigns. That is telling in itself.)

      Look, fire your researcher, as well as whomever told you that this silly argument was a winner. I'm all for useable history, as we say, but this is a fail on the basis of more than these facts for evidence. There's this little matter of other terms like "population data" that would suggest that your larger argument dismissing (and dissing) Milwaukee is just dumb.

      Stick to what you know, Madisonian.

      Delete
    5. Actually, she is correct. Falk has a solid plan. Barrett is not only going to be vulnerable to all sorts of attacks that he was defenseless against two years ago, but more on top of that. And even if he should somehow win tonight and again in June, he won't be changing a damn thing.

      And I am from Milwaukee, cupcake.

      Delete
    6. And if you are from Barrett's campaign, as I suspect you are, you just might want to be reaching out to me instead of trying to impugn me. Just sayin'.

      Delete
    7. Milwaukeean,

      I specifically stated "the last Democrat with strong ties to Milwaukee to be elected Governor," and McGovern was a Republican. That notwithstanding, McGovern was also elected over a century ago.

      Feel free to disagree with my analysis, but don't call my research flawed when the facts aren't on your side.

      -Lisa

      Delete
    8. Forgot to mention Emmanuel Philip in my previous response, but you've probably already figured out by now that he was also a Republican and elected darn near a century ago.

      Delete
  2. Milwaukeean,

    I guess I missed the glaring errors. What are they?

    I thought this was a well-written, well-reasoned piece. I thoroughly agree. After living in both Milwaukee and Dane County, I really wonder where the "electability" of Barrett comes from. I can see that County Government was well-run, open and cooperative with its largest city in Kathy Falk's Dane Co. I remember reading that KF had to negotiate with the County Board to keep her initiatives. It was always clear she was in charge - the quality of life improved and economic development flourished. In the City of Milwaukee, I don't see the same evidence of leadership. Actually, if I was not tuned-in to the community, I don't know that I could ID Barrett as Mayor. The only big Barrett initiative I can remember is his attempt to privatize the water system, which failed miserably.

    If he wins the primary, I'll vote for him. But, no one has made a case for him as the best candidate beyond "electability." I am sorry, I expect more from my public officials.

    ReplyDelete
  3. PS - If the establishment got behind Kathleen Falk with the same passion as they had when they collected signatures, she would be just as "electable."

    ReplyDelete