Monday, May 14, 2012

Why President Obama's Re-election Matters

This



And This! 

In Monsanto v. Geertson Seed Farms, No. 09-475, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case which could have an enormous effect on the future of the American food industry. This is Monsanto’s third appeal of the case, and if they win a favorable ruling from the high court, a deregulated Monsanto may find itself in position to corner the markets of numerous U.S. crops, and to litigate conventional farmers into oblivion.

Here’s where it gets a bit dicier. Two Supreme Court justices have what appear to be direct conflicts of interest.

Stephen Breyer
Charles Breyer, the judge who ruled in the original decision of 2007 which is being appealed, is Stephen Breyer’s brother, who apparently views this as a conflict of interest and has recused himself.

Clarence Thomas
From the years 1976 – 1979, Thomas worked as an attorney for Monsanto. Thomas apparently does not see this as a conflict of interest and has not recused himself.

Fox, meet henhouse.

The lawsuit was filed by plantiffs which include the Center for Food Safety, the National Family Farm Coalition, Sierra Club, Dakota Resources Council and other farm, environmental and consumer groups and individual farmers.

What would be worse?  Mitt Romney's assault on American manufacturing OR Mitt Romney's Supreme Court Choice(s)?

2 comments:

  1. ummmm Rommney left Bain Capital years before this plant closed. The person who was managing director when the plant closed was Jonathan Lavine, a bundler for the Obama campaign. whoops!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Would like to see the link on that please....also dont litter our site with anything from free republic.

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete